Vincent's at Barton reviewed
In a world where virtually anyone can be published online, there's a veritable tsunami of trash being made public out there, and the wave is building. There's also a growing number of websites and apps, including those focusing on food and travel, which make it easy for all and sundry to get their view on this that and the other out there.
Don't get me wrong. This can indeed be a good thing. It's very informative and often helpful when planning trips and outings. I often refer to review sites to get an idea of the restaurant or accommodation I'm considering to verify my choices or to perhaps warn me of the dire misery I might otherwise be stepping into. It keeps some establishments on their toes, knowing that if they provide really crap service or food, they might be called out on it publically. Of course, there's an insidious side to it as well, as good people and good businesses can be targeted unfairly by nasty people with a gripe and an iphone, but that's a whole other story.
What's really disheartening, though, is the number of 'reviews' published, which are in fact pure rubbish. Copious amounts of crap. People red with rage about small, inconsequential things, those with ridiculous expectations and those with over-inflated egos, and those with no bloody manners. I mean, hotels which only put one mint on your pillow instead of two, bananas in fruit bowls that don't curve enough, countries where locals dare to speak in foreign languages, beaches with too much sand!! It doesn't bear thinking about.
And way, way too many who think they know what they're talking about when they are actually clueless. Of course, there's always a range of opinions, but how can some rate a restaurant as excellent when others compare eating there to ingesting the soggy base layer of a street hopper bin? I must admit, as soon as I read the words 'tasty food' in a restaurant review, I'm out of there. What does that even mean, Mr I'm Pretending To Be a Reviewer? No, people, that is not enlightening or compelling. I expect a bit more in the reviews I read.
As the proliferation of 'reviews' by the uninformed, angry and illiterate rises, or otherwise the sycophantic, shallow panderings of those seeking favours and a multitude of 'likes', it helps to have a stalwart of trusted reviewers or review sites to turn to. Ones that provide honest, informed and discerning opinion, especially when it's washed down with a measure of good humour and an excellent command of the English language. Surely a few Insta-brightened travel pics and a few superlatives in hashtags is not always enough?
Here are the ones on the top of my list:
As he's based in England, I usually don't benefit directly from his opinions in relation to likely dining haunts, but at least I'm kept heartily entertained. However, he's currently in Oz so I will be keeping an eye out for his movements.
Naturally reviews or information sites don't always have to have a sting to be worthwhile, but without the honesty in there where necessary, how can we have the confidence to have faith in those that sing praises?
It's hugely regrettable that many reviewers, travellers and bloggers are fast-becoming the ubiquitous mouthpieces for anyone who'll throw them a few crumbs (#couscousforcomment) or a bit of insta-fame. I want some depth, some insight, some truth in the reviews and articles I read, not just some insipid platitudes and a cursory oversight.
There is much more to reviewing than the putting down of opinions or even facts. It must be done with honesty and fairness, and without aggression or personal attack. But reviewing also comes with a responsibility, to those who may be adversely affected, so consideration of consequences is essential.
One of the reasons I like Jay Rayner is that he takes this responsibility seriously, given his coverage. Perhaps all professional reviewers do. Taken from a recent interview he said: 'I am never casual about what I do. I think very carefully about it. Regularly, if it's a small, independent restaurant which is failing, I don't write about it and pay the bill myself.' This level of responsibility is often lacking in public review sites where the reviewer can hide anonymously.
To those out there who know their stuff, do the research, and are actual telling it like it is – in an intelligent and amusing fashion – kudos to you! May you continue to write and be read.
Disclaimer: There is none! I just like the above reviewers and sites.
Who's your favourite reviewer? And where do you go for your travel lowdown? What do I need to add to my list?
Source: The art of writing a food or travel review: those who can
No comments:
Post a Comment